firm information attorneys manuals seminars on-site training
HR resources e-newsletter legal news links contact

E-Newsletter

May 2003

Wisconsin Court of Appeals Rules That No Wage Penalty Can Be Recovered Where Overdue Wages Have Already Been Paid

In a case of first impression, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals for District III (Wausau) recently ruled that an employer who pays overdue wages prior to an employee commencing suit is relieved from the wage penalty obligations under Wisconsin law. The Court of Appeals held in Hubbard v. Shawn Messer, d/b/a Degree Systems, Case No. 02-1701-FT that no penalty was appropriate on the wages that were previously owed to the plaintiff, Neal Hubbard, but were paid by his former employer, Shawn Messer, before Hubbard started his lawsuit. The Court of Appeals reversed the Circuit Court's order that awarded a 70% penalty on the wages previously owed, along with Hubbard's attorney fees.

Employers should take seriously the DWD administrative/investigative process. These types of claims should be reviewed in detail "up front" and addressing them should not be delayed. If there is a valid claim, the employer should pay it and not wait for the employee to commence suit or hope the employee "just goes away." If an employer pays an undisputed amount of a claim before the employee starts a lawsuit, and there remains a disputed amount, the penalty wages should only be based on the remaining disputed amount and not the original amount claimed.

The Court of Appeals' holding in Hubbard will encourage employees to either bypass the administrative process with DWD and go right to court, or file suit far sooner after exhausting the administrative process in order to have available the wage penalty and attorney fee recoveries under Wisconsin law. The court still has discretion to award the full penalty or a percentage of it, and if an employee bypasses the DWD, the maximum potential penalty wages drop from 100% to 50%. However, once an employee's claim has been filed in court, the stakes will go up as to what the potential recovery will be.

For more information on this case, see our May 2003 Issue of the Month at www.krukowski.com.


firm information attorneys manuals seminars on-site training e-newsletter legal news links contact


© Krukowski & Costello, 2010 Disclaimer: Krukowski & Costello, S.C., presents this information for educational purposes only. While this information is about legal issues, it is not legal advice. For legal advice about specific legal cases, consult your attorney, or call (414) 423-1330 and ask to speak to an attorney at Krukowski & Costello, S.C.

Use of our website does not create an attorney/client relationship with our firm or any attorney in our firm. Entering into an attorney/client relationship with Krukowski & Costello, S.C. requires either a telephone or face-to-face conference with an attorney from Krukowski & Costello, S.C. and a written retention agreement executed between the client and the law firm. The attorney/client relationship cannot be established by sending an unsolicited e-mail, regular mail and/or leaving a voicemail, and those that do should have no expectation of any protected privilege. Please do not send us any confidential information until an attorney/client relationship is established consistent with the above, and we authorize you to do so.