firm information attorneys manuals seminars on-site training
HR resources e-newsletter legal news links contact

E-Newsletter

July 2004

Employers May Be Required to Accommodate Work Restrictions Permanently

With its June 30, 2004 decision in Hutchinson Technology, Inc. v. LIRC et al, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has redefined how employers will need to deal with employees who want to return to work with temporary or permanent physical and mental work restrictions.

The case involved a worker, Susan Roytek, who returned to work at Hutchinson Technology with a restriction that allowed her to work only six hours of her required twelve-hour shift. Employees at the Company worked a schedule of three 12-hour days one week and four 12-hour days the next for a total of eighty-four hours every two weeks. Hutchinson allowed Roytek to work a six-hour modified schedule for two months until her doctor authorized her to increase her daily shift to eight (8) hours. Hutchinson kept Roytek on the eight-hour shift for six additional months because her doctor repeatedly indicated that Roytek’s restriction needed to be continued until her "next monthly appointment." The Company finally terminated Roytek’s employment when her short-term disability pay ran out and her eight-hour work restriction became permanent.

 The Wisconsin Supreme Court found that due to her eight-hour work restriction, Susan Roytek was disabled and entitled to accommodation under the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act (WFEA). The Court found that Hutchinson Technology was required to allow Roytek to work a reduced eight-hour shift as the “reasonable accommodation” of her disability under the WFEA. To accommodate the reduced hours, the Company was also required to allow her to modify her duties so that she worked only one of the four functions through which her position normally rotated. The key to the Court’s decision was that because Hutchinson Technology had allowed Roytek to work the reduced hours schedule for eight months without showing that any hardship had occurred, the Company had to allow her to continue with that schedule on a permanent basis. Hutchinson did not make any concrete showing of financial and/or operational hardship caused by Roytek’s shortened hours.

Combined with the 2003 Wisconsin Supreme Court case of Crystal Lake Cheese Factory v. LIRC, the Hutchinson Technology decision has far-reaching effects for Wisconsin employers. An employer now appears to be obligated to provide an employee, having physical or mental restrictions, with at least a temporary opportunity for a requested job modification if the request is not patently unreasonable or will not cause clear hardship. Additionally, all options for reasonable and seemingly unreasonable accommodation must be reviewed and employer responses to each must be documented. If an employer modifies a position on a temporary basis for an employee with restrictions, the temporary nature of the assignments need to be emphasized. Employers should track and document any decreases or bottlenecks in work quantity or quality, customer or coworker complaints, or any other impact on the department or operation to demonstrate that the requested accommodation is not “reasonable” and has created a hardship.

Hutchinson Technology may also impact the hiring process. If an applicant can show that an employer has previously temporarily accommodated individual restrictions of the type presented by the applicant, an employer may be required to provide an applicant the same accommodation if it is reasonable at the time.

Best practices will require employers to actively manage employee injuries and accommodations. As part of accommodation management, employers will need to repeat reasonableness and hardship determinations on a regular basis throughout the course of any accommodation provided. Employers should track all accommodations provided with consistent documentation and recordkeeping. Additionally, during any period of medical leave, an employer should document hardship incurred in the event the employee seeks a continuing accommodation after the medical leave ends.

Without it, employers will be required to accommodate any permanent job restriction for which an employee shows an effective accommodation exists.

For more information regarding employment law issues, please call our educational services department at (414) 423-1330 or e-mail kam@kclegal.com.


firm information attorneys manuals seminars on-site training e-newsletter legal news links contact


© Krukowski & Costello, 2010 Disclaimer: Krukowski & Costello, S.C., presents this information for educational purposes only. While this information is about legal issues, it is not legal advice. For legal advice about specific legal cases, consult your attorney, or call (414) 423-1330 and ask to speak to an attorney at Krukowski & Costello, S.C.

Use of our website does not create an attorney/client relationship with our firm or any attorney in our firm. Entering into an attorney/client relationship with Krukowski & Costello, S.C. requires either a telephone or face-to-face conference with an attorney from Krukowski & Costello, S.C. and a written retention agreement executed between the client and the law firm. The attorney/client relationship cannot be established by sending an unsolicited e-mail, regular mail and/or leaving a voicemail, and those that do should have no expectation of any protected privilege. Please do not send us any confidential information until an attorney/client relationship is established consistent with the above, and we authorize you to do so.