firm information attorneys manuals seminars on-site training
HR resources e-newsletter legal news links contact

E-Newsletter

July 2001

FMLA News

Administering the Family and Medical Leave Act is probably the top regulatory headache currently affecting human resource personnel. Overly expansive regulations are testing employer limits as they sort out federal and state leave law applications, intermittent leave requests and tracking, and the expanding definition of serious health condition.

In addition, federal appeals courts take conflicting views regarding required notice, serious health conditions and the validity of Federal Regulations. The FMLA is a law in flux throughout the country. Congress is attempting to address the conflict through recently proposed legislation. The FMLA Revision Bill would modify the definition of "serious health condition" to exclude leave that would fall within a modest sick leave policy for which treatment and recovery are brief. Additionally, the bill would restrict intermittent leave to minimum four hour blocks of time. Employees would assume the responsibility for designating desired leave as FMLA leave. Finally, all DOL regulations would be rewritten and reissued. Congress has not yet actively addressed the proposal, but the debate over the revisions will likely be intense and resolution of conflicts is not on the near horizon.

The U.S. Supreme Court is also grappling with the validity of the FMLA notice regulations. At issue is the validity of the federal regulation which allows an employee who has taken leave, to retain her 12 weeks of FMLA leave if an employer fails to designate the leave already taken as FMLA leave. As written and applied, the regulation grants an employee more leave than designated in the statute.

With the seeming imbalance between court interpretation and overly broad regulations, it is crucial for covered employers to have a strong understanding of FMLA basics and a carefully crafted family and medical leave policy. A recent Illinois Federal District Court required an otherwise non-covered employer to provide family and medical leave benefits to an employee based on specific FMLA language in its handbook which created a binding contract.

For more information about FMLA and other employment law issues, call Krukowski & Costello, S.C. at (414) 423-1330, or e-mail educational services.


firm information attorneys manuals seminars on-site training e-newsletter legal news links contact


© Krukowski & Costello, 2010 Disclaimer: Krukowski & Costello, S.C., presents this information for educational purposes only. While this information is about legal issues, it is not legal advice. For legal advice about specific legal cases, consult your attorney, or call (414) 423-1330 and ask to speak to an attorney at Krukowski & Costello, S.C.

Use of our website does not create an attorney/client relationship with our firm or any attorney in our firm. Entering into an attorney/client relationship with Krukowski & Costello, S.C. requires either a telephone or face-to-face conference with an attorney from Krukowski & Costello, S.C. and a written retention agreement executed between the client and the law firm. The attorney/client relationship cannot be established by sending an unsolicited e-mail, regular mail and/or leaving a voicemail, and those that do should have no expectation of any protected privilege. Please do not send us any confidential information until an attorney/client relationship is established consistent with the above, and we authorize you to do so.